Latest News

I Feel So Used and Manipulated by Erin Andrews

Tuesday, August 18, 2009 , Posted by Christopher Byrne at 12:30 PM, under ,

Updated at 3:02 PM, August 18, 2009

To remove some ambiguity in how people are interpreting this commentary, I have made some changes/adjustments below. To be clear, I am not saying that the illegal videos from earlier this year should be condoned in any way, shape, or form. I am saying that the environment that developed that allowed someone to shoot and distribute those videos was the result of many factors, and the selling of sexuality in print and media is just as much a factor as the web sites.blogs the publish the material.

I feel used and manipulated. I feel like someone who took the bait and stood up and defended a person whose privacy was defiled. I criticized sites such as Deadspin for objectifying and sexualizing a female public figure, and contributing to an environment which led to problems.

Yes, I jumped on the bandwagon for the poor, helpless Erin Andrews who was suffering because of the illegally taken and posted videos from her hotel room. But I was not the only one. I wonder if they feel the same as I do right now?

Why am I waxing ruefully over my criticisms of the person who posted the video, and the web sites that took great glee and web hits over the years by posting provocative pictures of Andrews and others?

Because Erin Andrews has blown it. She has thrown out any credibility as the "victim" of sexual personification and obsession. She has lost credibility in my eyes. But will she lose it in the eyes of others?

No, I am not saying she was not wronged. She clearly was, and hopefully the person who posted the video(s) is found and prosecuted.

However, if Andrews really felt wronged, she should never have allowed GQ to go forward with this month's sexually provocative photo and video shoot that she WILLINGLY participated. Yes the shoot occurred last April. The contracts were signed before then, and once the pictures/video was in the can, she had no control over when GQ would publish them.

Then why should she have agreed to do the shoot at all? Is it because using sexuality might help boost a career (and this applies to anyone who appears to be doing so)?

But just read this quote from the GQ article:

“I’ve always looked out for my career first."

She sure does and is. It is just appears hypocritical on its face.

Ma, and just maybe, ESPN should consider how much more egregious this appears than anything someone might say on Facebook or Twitter, and modify that policy accordingly.

And no, I will not link to the GQ article, photos, or video. I will not be an enabler.

I...I...I just feel so violated.

Thanks to Ed Berliner of Stone Cold Sports for posting information about this GQ piece on Facebook.

Currently have 5 comments:

  1. Arthur says:

    have you seen these pictures? Miley Cirus photos are more risque.

  1. Yes I have, as well as the video. The suggestiveness, camera angles, and tome of the accompanying story makes it much different than Miley Cyrus.

    Even thought he shoot was done a reported three months before the illegal video blew out into the wild, she and her lawyers had to have known about it.

    That appears to be either poor judgment or extreme manipulation

  1. Joel says:

    So let me get this straight - because a woman agreed to do a sexy photo shoot, that gives someone the right to film her without her knowledge when she is alone in a hotel room? Are you kidding me?

    I don't care if the person in question is Jenna Jameson, it is a complete violation to film someone walking around naked in their hotel room without their knowledge and then post it on the Internet.

    Erin Andrews has every right to take sexy photos if she so chooses. She should be the one to decide what she does and does not want the public to see. Taking that choice out of her hands is wrong and that's the issue.

    It's almost like you are saying she deserved to have this video leaked because she did a photo shoot. That's an incredibly sexist and moronic response.

  1. Then you have not read what I have written.

    I have clearly stated many times that what that person did is wrong.

    I am addressing the factors that create an environment where someone could possibly think it is ok to do such a thing. And no one deserves to have such a thing done to him or her.

    Yes, Andrews has to make choices and decisions, and has the right to do so. No one is trying to take that away from here, or anybody else.

    But how are people to interpret things with headlines such as:


    "Erin Andrews Gets Down and Dirty in New GQ" (Fox News)

    The publications are not selling a story on how much she has accomplished professionally. They are selling sex, sexuality, and sex appeal.

  1. Agree 100%...the lead into the GQ video, with its chest and skirt shots, is akin to a legal Erin Andrews sex(y) tape.....

Leave a Reply

Post a Comment